NDC Regional Organizer Confiscates Vehicle Over “Unreasonable” Auction Price

The vehicle in question was sold to the former Deputy Clerk for GH¢13,000, with an additional duty of GH¢20,000.

According to Nukpenu, he took this action because he believes the vehicle was undervalued and the sale constitutes a “crime against the state.” He questioned how a vehicle used by the Deputy Clerk for nine years could be sold at such a low price, especially considering its value and the duty paid ¹.

In an interview with Mugabe Maase on TV XYZ, Nukpenu presented documents supporting his claim, including the car’s customs document and auction letter. He challenged the former Deputy Clerk, asking if the GH¢13,000 paid for the vehicle was commensurate with its value. Nukpenu also questioned the additional duty of GH¢20,000 paid by the former Deputy Clerk.

Nukpenu’s actions have sparked controversy, with some questioning his authority to confiscate the vehicle. However, he remains adamant that his actions were justified, citing the need to prevent the misuse of state assets.

This incident raises concerns about corruption and the management of state assets in Ghana. It highlights the need for transparency and accountability in the auctioning of state properties, ensuring that such transactions are fair and reasonable.

The National Democratic Congress (NDC) has been vocal about its commitment to fighting corruption and promoting good governance. Nukpenu’s actions, in this case, may be seen as an attempt to uphold these principles.

However, it is essential to note that Nukpenu’s methods have been questioned by some. In a previous interview, he acknowledged that the NDC’s campaign team had ignored party structures, leading to the party’s historic defeat in the elections ¹.

The incident also underscores the need for effective communication and collaboration between government agencies and the public. If Parliament feels that vehicles like the Toyota Land Cruiser V8 are no longer needed, they should be allocated to district assemblies for work purposes, as suggested by Nukpenu.

In conclusion, Anthony Nukpenu’s claim and subsequent actions have brought attention to the need for transparency and accountability in the management of state assets. While his methods may be debated, his commitment to preventing corruption and promoting good governance is commendable. As Ghana continues to navigate the complexities of governance, incidents like this serve as a reminder of the importance of vigilance and accountability.